SATYANARAYAN KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJNEESH VARDHAN — A.B.A./2115/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),351(2),324(4),308(2),3(5)BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010111282026
Filing Number
A.B.A./7228/2026
Filing Date
04-Apr-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./2115/2026
Registration Date
17-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 482 ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SATYANARAYAN KUMAR
Adv. RESHMA KUMARI,DR. HASNAIN WARIS,DR. HASNAIN WARIS, ,NAVRATNA MAHATO,DR. HASNAIN WARIS
-
2.UMESH KUMAR GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJNEESH VARDHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
Case Summary: A.B.A. 2115/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Satyanarayan Kumar and Umesh Kumar Gupta, who faced arrest for alleged land-digging and extortion. The court found that their sale deed and mutation documents prima facie established lawful land ownership and peaceful possession, with the dispute relating to possession pending separately before the Sub Divisional Magistrate. Each petitioner was granted bail on furnishing Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
29-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
15-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2115/2026
Case Summary: A.B.A. 2115/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Satyanarayan Kumar and Umesh Kumar Gupta, who faced arrest for alleged land-digging and extortion. The court found that their sale deed and mutation documents prima facie established lawful land ownership and peaceful possession, with the dispute relating to possession pending separately before the Sub Divisional Magistrate. Each petitioner was granted bail on furnishing Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts