ASHISH YADAV vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ARUP KR DEY — A.B.A./2107/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 274,275,292,317(5),3(5),BNS,47(a),EXCISE,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010110922026

Filing Number

A.B.A./7199/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2107/2026

Registration Date

16-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CUSTOM & EXCISE ( 122 )

Sub-Category

Excise (malt Liquors) Act,1890 ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 274,275,292,317(5),3(5),BNS,47(a),EXCISE,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHISH YADAV

    Adv. YOGENDRA YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ARUP KR DEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Ashish Yadav's anticipatory bail petition in an illegal liquor case. Yadav, the owner of a Bolero vehicle, claimed his driver loaded 20 cartons of illegal liquor without his knowledge. The court found that since the vehicle is non-commercial, allegedly had a changed number plate used for liquor transportation, and Yadav is the owner, he did not merit anticipatory bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  5. 13-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2107/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Ashish Yadav's anticipatory bail petition in an illegal liquor case. Yadav, the owner of a Bolero vehicle, claimed his driver loaded 20 cartons of illegal liquor without his knowledge. The court found that since the vehicle is non-commercial, allegedly had a changed number plate used for liquor transportation, and Yadav is the owner, he did not merit anticipatory bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case