MD ALAM ALIAS MOHAMMAD ALAM vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VIJOY KUMAR SINHA — JHHC10110612025
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010110612025
Filing Number
Cr.Rev./7481/2025
Filing Date
29-Mar-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD ALAM ALIAS MOHAMMAD ALAM
Adv. ABHAY KR CHATURVEDY,CHANDAN KUMAR,CHANDAN KUMAR, ,RAJESH KR SINGH,HADISH ANSARI,CHANDAN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VIJOY KUMAR SINHA
-
2.RAMAWTAR SAH
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
Case Summary The High Court of Jharkhand (Criminal Revision No. 7481 of 2025) allowed the petitioner's application to condone a 206-day delay in filing the revision petition, accepting his excuse of being unaware of the criminal appeal's disposal. The court issued notice to opposite party Ramavtar Sah regarding an exemption application concerning compensation deposited by the petitioner, with replies due by 10.06.2026. Until the next hearing, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner in Complaint Case No. 541 of 2017. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF
-
29-Apr-2025
Lawazima
Registrar (Judicial)
-
29-Mar-2025
Case filed
Case Summary The High Court of Jharkhand (Criminal Revision No. 7481 of 2025) allowed the petitioner's application to condone a 206-day delay in filing the revision petition, accepting his excuse of being unaware of the criminal appeal's disposal. The court issued notice to opposite party Ramavtar Sah regarding an exemption application concerning compensation deposited by the petitioner, with replies due by 10.06.2026. Until the next hearing, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner in Complaint Case No. 541 of 2017. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts