MD. GANI ALIAS ABDUL GANI vs M/S SHREESAINATH (INDIA) PRIVATE LTD, REPRESENTED THRO ITS DIRECTOR MR. ABHISHEK SINGH Advocate - PARTH S. A. SWAROOP PATI, ,RAHUL KR GUPTA,RAKESH KUMAR SINGH,VAISHNAVI KAUSHIK — C.M.P./353/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010110242026

Filing Number

C.M.P./3877/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

C.M.P./353/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

ARTICLE-227 ( 13 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 20-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD. GANI ALIAS ABDUL GANI

    Adv. AMAR KUMAR SINHA,MD. ABDUL WAHAB,MD. ABDUL WAHAB, ,SUMIT KUMAR,SANDEEP VERMA,MD. ABDUL WAHAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S SHREESAINATH (INDIA) PRIVATE LTD, REPRESENTED THRO ITS DIRECTOR MR. ABHISHEK SINGH Advocate - PARTH S. A. SWAROOP PATI, ,RAHUL KR GUPTA,RAKESH KUMAR SINGH,VAISHNAVI KAUSHIK

  2. 2.RITA BISWAS

  3. 3.BHAGYASHREE BISWAS

  4. 4.SUMIT BISWAS

  5. 5.RIYA BISWAS ALIAS RIYA PUJARI

  6. 6.BISWAJIT BISWAS

  7. 7.MITALI YADAV

  8. 8.NARENDRA KAUR

  9. 9.SMT. BISHAN LATA DHAMIJA

  10. 10.FATIMA BEGAM

  11. 11.AMINA KHATOON

  12. 12.GULAB MOHAMMAD

  13. 13.MD. JAMAL

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Summary: In C.M.P. No. 353 of 2026 before the High Court of Jharkhand, the court ordered status quo to be maintained regarding possession of the disputed property as it existed at 4:45 p.m. on April 13, 2026. The petitioner claimed the property was a residential house, while the opposite parties contended it was a shop and had already handed over possession. The court imposed the status quo order to preserve the existing state pending further proceedings, given the conflicting claims of the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.M.P./353/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In C.M.P. No. 353 of 2026 before the High Court of Jharkhand, the court ordered status quo to be maintained regarding possession of the disputed property as it existed at 4:45 p.m. on April 13, 2026. The petitioner claimed the property was a residential house, while the opposite parties contended it was a shop and had already handed over possession. The court imposed the status quo order to preserve the existing state pending further proceedings, given the conflicting claims of the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case