NAND KISHORE PASWAN vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VANDANA BHARTI, ,PRAMOD KR. CHOUDHARY — A.B.A./2179/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 318(4),338,336(3),340(2),303(2),351(3),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 07th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010108972026
Filing Number
A.B.A./7062/2026
Filing Date
02-Apr-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./2179/2026
Registration Date
20-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 482 ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NAND KISHORE PASWAN
Adv. MANOJ KR. NO.2
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VANDANA BHARTI, ,PRAMOD KR. CHOUDHARY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
Summary: The Jharkhand High Court rejected Nand Kishore Paswan's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving alleged fraudulent sale of the informant's land. The court found direct allegations that Paswan, authorized to manage the informant's property, sold land to a third party after the informant's father's death and issued threats. While acknowledging that purely civil matters cannot form criminal cases, the court held that criminality was demonstrated here through fraudulent sale and threats, permitting both civil and criminal proceedings to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
30-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
17-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2179/2026
Summary: The Jharkhand High Court rejected Nand Kishore Paswan's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving alleged fraudulent sale of the informant's land. The court found direct allegations that Paswan, authorized to manage the informant's property, sold land to a third party after the informant's father's death and issued threats. While acknowledging that purely civil matters cannot form criminal cases, the court held that criminality was demonstrated here through fraudulent sale and threats, permitting both civil and criminal proceedings to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts