M/S S.P. YADAV THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED PARTNER ASHOK KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH THE SECRETARY-CUM-COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF STATE TAX Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN — WPC/2716/2026
Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed of as Withdrawn on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010108842026
Filing Number
WPC/3830/2026
Filing Date
02-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPC/2716/2026
Registration Date
17-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
TAXATION ( 186 )
Sub-Category
Goods And Service Tax ( 43 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Disposed of as Withdrawn
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S S.P. YADAV THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED PARTNER ASHOK KUMAR
Adv. SURESH PRAJAPATI, ,SATYENDRA PANDIT
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH THE SECRETARY-CUM-COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF STATE TAX Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN
-
2.THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, STATE TAX OFFICE, HAZARIBAGH CIRCLE
-
3.SHRI RANJIT KUMAR, STATE TAX OFFICER, HAZARIBAGH CIRLCE
-
4.SHRI SURJIT KUMAR, STATE TAX OFFICER, HAZARIBAGH CIRCLE
-
5.THE SUPERINTENDENT, RANGE II, HAZARIBAGH DIVISION
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court disposed of M/s S.P. Yadav's writ petition after the petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to challenge the impugned tax order through alternate remedies available under the Act. The court granted the withdrawal request, left all contentions open, and imposed no costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
High on Board
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
02-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2716/2026
The Jharkhand High Court disposed of M/s S.P. Yadav's writ petition after the petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to challenge the impugned tax order through alternate remedies available under the Act. The court granted the withdrawal request, left all contentions open, and imposed no costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts