MANOJ JHA ALIAS MANOJ KUMAR JHA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILENDRA KUMAR TIWARI Spl.P.P. — B.A./3144/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 316(2),318(2),319(2),338,336(3),340(2),61(2),BNS,66(C),66(D),IT,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010108772026
Filing Number
B.A./7053/2026
Filing Date
02-Apr-2026
Registration No
B.A./3144/2026
Registration Date
13-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Information Technology Act, 2000 ( 208 )
Sub-Category
Cyber Crime ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANOJ JHA ALIAS MANOJ KUMAR JHA
Adv. NAVEEN KUMAR JAISWAL,NUTAN KUMARI SHARMA,NUTAN KUMARI SHARMA, ,NUTAN KUMARI SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILENDRA KUMAR TIWARI Spl.P.P.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: B.A. 3144/2026 The Jharkhand High Court rejected Manoj Jha's bail application in a cyber-fraud case involving Rs. 33 lakh defrauded through mobile communication. The court found that Jha's prior bail rejection, numerous criminal antecedents, and direct allegations of cyber fraud weighed against release, and rejected his offer to deposit the defrauded amount as bail security, noting it would serve no legal purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3144/2026
Case Summary: B.A. 3144/2026 The Jharkhand High Court rejected Manoj Jha's bail application in a cyber-fraud case involving Rs. 33 lakh defrauded through mobile communication. The court found that Jha's prior bail rejection, numerous criminal antecedents, and direct allegations of cyber fraud weighed against release, and rejected his offer to deposit the defrauded amount as bail security, noting it would serve no legal purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts