SANVA BHUINYA ALAIS SOPNU BHARTI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY — A.B.A./2174/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 33,I,C, IF,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010108502026
Filing Number
A.B.A./7039/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./2174/2026
Registration Date
20-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
FOREST ( 137 )
Sub-Category
Indian Forest Act ,1927 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANVA BHUINYA ALAIS SOPNU BHARTI
Adv. TANU KUMARI
-
2.TULETAR BHARTI ALIAS KULETAR BHARTI
-
3.PUNIT BHARTI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
Case Summary: A.B.A. 2174/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Sanva Bhuinya, Tuletar Bharti, and Punit Bharti) facing charges under Section 33(1)(c) of the Indian Forest Act for alleged unauthorized poppy cultivation on forest land. The court relied on the petitioners' clean criminal records and the fact that the disputed land belonged to the forest department, not the petitioners themselves. Order: The petitioners must surrender within three weeks and will be released on bail upon furnishing Rs. 25,000 bonds each with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
30-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
09-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2174/2026
Case Summary: A.B.A. 2174/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Sanva Bhuinya, Tuletar Bharti, and Punit Bharti) facing charges under Section 33(1)(c) of the Indian Forest Act for alleged unauthorized poppy cultivation on forest land. The court relied on the petitioners' clean criminal records and the fact that the disputed land belonged to the forest department, not the petitioners themselves. Order: The petitioners must surrender within three weeks and will be released on bail upon furnishing Rs. 25,000 bonds each with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts