RAJ PASWAN ALIAS HARIKESH PRASAD PASWAN vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHIV SHANKAR KUMAR, ,ANSHUMAN KUMAR,ASHOK KUMAR SINHA — A.B.A./2014/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 303(2),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010107872026

Filing Number

A.B.A./6992/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2014/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 482 ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 303(2),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJ PASWAN ALIAS HARIKESH PRASAD PASWAN

    Adv. ARPIT KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHIV SHANKAR KUMAR, ,ANSHUMAN KUMAR,ASHOK KUMAR SINHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    Case Summary: A.B.A. 2014/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed Raj Paswan's petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application before the trial court. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal after brief arguments, which the State and informant did not oppose. The trial court will decide any subsequent bail application on its merits without prejudice to this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2014/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: A.B.A. 2014/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed Raj Paswan's petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application before the trial court. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal after brief arguments, which the State and informant did not oppose. The trial court will decide any subsequent bail application on its merits without prejudice to this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case