MD.AKBAR KHAN@ AKBAR KHAN vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VANDANA BHARTI — Cr.M.P./973/2026
Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 406,420,34,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 15th April 2026.
CNR: JHHC010107742026
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./6985/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Registration No
Cr.M.P./973/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Quashing Matter ( 206 )
Sub-Category
Quashing of Order ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 22-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD.AKBAR KHAN@ AKBAR KHAN
Adv. PRAVEEN SHANKAR PRASAD,LUKESH KUMAR,LUKESH KUMAR, ,NAMASHYU KEJRIWAL,SIDHARTH SUDHANSHU,LUKESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VANDANA BHARTI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Summary: The Jharkhand High Court quashed the Judicial Magistrate's order fixing the accused's appearance date as 09.03.2026 (within 30 days from proclamation publication on 09.02.2026), holding it violated Section 82 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which mandates appearance "not less than 30 days from the date of publishing" the proclamation. The court found the magistrate committed an error by not accounting for calendar days properly and directed a fresh order in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.M.P./973/2026
Summary: The Jharkhand High Court quashed the Judicial Magistrate's order fixing the accused's appearance date as 09.03.2026 (within 30 days from proclamation publication on 09.02.2026), holding it violated Section 82 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which mandates appearance "not less than 30 days from the date of publishing" the proclamation. The court found the magistrate committed an error by not accounting for calendar days properly and directed a fresh order in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts