GULAB ANSARI vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILESH KR SINHA — A.B.A./2001/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 190,191(2),195(I),126(2),115(2),109(2),121(1),125(b),132,262,263(a),351(2),352,BNS. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 04th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010107462026
Filing Number
A.B.A./6966/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./2001/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 482 ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GULAB ANSARI
Adv. SUDHANSU KUMAR DEO
-
2.MD.FARUK ANSARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILESH KR SINHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Gulab Ansari and Md. Faruk Ansari in connection with Sarath P.S. Case No. 08 of 2026. The court found sufficient grounds in the FIR alleging that the petitioners resisted police, facilitated the escape of apprehended cyber criminals from custody, and physically assaulted police personnel; the court was also influenced by petitioner no. 1's prior criminal antecedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
27-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2001/2026
The High Court of Jharkhand rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Gulab Ansari and Md. Faruk Ansari in connection with Sarath P.S. Case No. 08 of 2026. The court found sufficient grounds in the FIR alleging that the petitioners resisted police, facilitated the escape of apprehended cyber criminals from custody, and physically assaulted police personnel; the court was also influenced by petitioner no. 1's prior criminal antecedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts