NITISH KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - V.S.SAHAY — A.B.A./2018/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,351(2),351(3),352,3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010107272026
Filing Number
A.B.A./6948/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./2018/2026
Registration Date
13-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 482 ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NITISH KUMAR
Adv. SURAJ SINGH,SUNIL SINGH,SUNIL SINGH, ,SUNIL SINGH
-
2.ROHIT KUMAR ALIAS ROHIT KUMAR YADAV
-
3.RAJU YADAV ALIAS RAJU KUMAR YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - V.S.SAHAY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners facing assault charges arising from a cricket match dispute that escalated when elders became involved. The court considered the mutual nature of the case (both sides filed counter-cases and received injuries), the petitioners' clean criminal records, and the incident's origin as a children's quarrel. Each petitioner was granted bail on furnishing Rs.25,000 bond with two sureties, with a directive to surrender within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
27-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
08-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2018/2026
The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners facing assault charges arising from a cricket match dispute that escalated when elders became involved. The court considered the mutual nature of the case (both sides filed counter-cases and received injuries), the petitioners' clean criminal records, and the incident's origin as a children's quarrel. Each petitioner was granted bail on furnishing Rs.25,000 bond with two sureties, with a directive to surrender within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts