MD. AZHAR ANSARI ALIAS AZHAR ANSARI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ARUP KR DEY — B.A./3249/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 96,64(2)(m),3(5),BNS,6,POCSO,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010107242026
Filing Number
B.A./6946/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Registration No
B.A./3249/2026
Registration Date
16-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )
Sub-Category
Protection of children from sexual offences Act ( 14 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD. AZHAR ANSARI ALIAS AZHAR ANSARI
Adv. RAHUL RANJAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ARUP KR DEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand granted regular bail to MD. Azhar Ansari, accused in a POCSO case, after finding that a trial court witness attributed allegations solely to co-accused Alamgir Ansari and could not implicate or identify the petitioner. The court ordered his release on Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties, conditioning that he not disturb witnesses and cooperate with trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
-
18-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
13-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3249/2026
The High Court of Jharkhand granted regular bail to MD. Azhar Ansari, accused in a POCSO case, after finding that a trial court witness attributed allegations solely to co-accused Alamgir Ansari and could not implicate or identify the petitioner. The court ordered his release on Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties, conditioning that he not disturb witnesses and cooperate with trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts