SUBLESH YADAV vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA — B.A./3733/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 22,25,27A,29,NDPS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 04th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010107052026
Filing Number
B.A./6932/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Registration No
B.A./3733/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
DRUGS & MEDICINES ( 125 )
Sub-Category
Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUBLESH YADAV
Adv. PEEYUSH KRISHNA CHOUDHARY,AMRIT ANUNAY,AMRIT ANUNAY, ,AMRIT ANUNAY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Sublesh Yadav, accused in an NDPS case involving 2.42 gm of brown sugar (small quantity), considering his clean criminal record, prolonged jail custody since February 16, 2026, and willingness to cooperate with trial. The court released him on Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties and conditions including furnishing mobile number, Aadhar card, and undertaking not to contact witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
09-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3733/2026
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Sublesh Yadav, accused in an NDPS case involving 2.42 gm of brown sugar (small quantity), considering his clean criminal record, prolonged jail custody since February 16, 2026, and willingness to cooperate with trial. The court released him on Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties and conditions including furnishing mobile number, Aadhar card, and undertaking not to contact witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts