KEDAR BHAGAT vs JANMANJAY BHAGAT — C.M.P./483/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010106502026

Filing Number

C.M.P./3747/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

C.M.P./483/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

Recall of the Order ( 46 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KEDAR BHAGAT

    Adv. BHAIYA V. KUMAR,SACHIN MAHATO,SACHIN MAHATO, ,SACHIN MAHATO

  2. 2.MUNNI DEVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JANMANJAY BHAGAT

  2. 2.GUPTESHWAR BHAGAT

  3. 3.OM PRAKASH BHAGAT

  4. 4.MUKESH BHAGAT

  5. 5.DENWANTI DEVI

  6. 6.BIMLA DEVI

  7. 7.MANOHAR BHAGAT

  8. 8.VIJAY BHAGAT

  9. 9.RUPESH BHAGAT

  10. 10.PRAMILA BHAGAT

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  3. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Summary: C.M.P. (Filing) No. 3747 of 2026 The High Court of Jharkhand granted an interlocutory application filed by petitioners Kedar Bhagat and Munni Devi, ignoring defects noted by the stamp reporter regarding incorrect address details and non-inclusion of deceased parties as respondents. The court found the petitioners were unaware of the address errors and noted that two deceased respondents' legal representatives were already represented. The case is to be listed for further hearing after registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Lawazima

    Registrar (Judicial)

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.M.P./483/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: C.M.P. (Filing) No. 3747 of 2026 The High Court of Jharkhand granted an interlocutory application filed by petitioners Kedar Bhagat and Munni Devi, ignoring defects noted by the stamp reporter regarding incorrect address details and non-inclusion of deceased parties as respondents. The court found the petitioners were unaware of the address errors and noted that two deceased respondents' legal representatives were already represented. The case is to be listed for further hearing after registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case