RAKESH KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MD SHAHABUDDIN — Cont.(Cvl)/510/2026
Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 19th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010106342026
Filing Number
Cont.(Cvl)/3738/2026
Filing Date
30-Mar-2026
Registration No
Cont.(Cvl)/510/2026
Registration Date
14-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONTEMPT ( 118 )
Sub-Category
Contempt of Courts Act 1971 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
19-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAKESH KUMAR
Adv. SHEKHAR PRASAD GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MD SHAHABUDDIN
-
2.SRI UMA SHANKAR SINGH, THE PR SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY DEPT., GOVT. OF JHARKHAND
-
3.SRI MANOJ KUMAR RANJAN, THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, DEPT. OF SCHOOL EDUCATION LITERACY
-
4.SRI HEMANT SATI, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SAHIBGANJ
-
5.SRI HARSH KUMAR, THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SAHIBGANJ
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed Rakesh Kumar's contempt application against state education officials. The petitioner alleged violation of a December 2023 court order, but the respondents demonstrated compliance by reconsidering and rejecting his candidature afresh. Finding the prior order satisfied, the court dropped the contempt proceedings while permitting the petitioner to pursue other legal remedies for his underlying grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
30-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Cont.(Cvl)/510/2026
Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed Rakesh Kumar's contempt application against state education officials. The petitioner alleged violation of a December 2023 court order, but the respondents demonstrated compliance by reconsidering and rejecting his candidature afresh. Finding the prior order satisfied, the court dropped the contempt proceedings while permitting the petitioner to pursue other legal remedies for his underlying grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts