JANNAT ANSARI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJNEESH VARDHAN — A.B.A./2032/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 406,420,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010106162026

Filing Number

A.B.A./6888/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2032/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 482 ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 406,420,IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JANNAT ANSARI

    Adv. SANJAY KUMAR PANDEY,ASHWINI KR UPADHYAY,ASHWINI KR UPADHYAY, ,ASHWINI KR UPADHYAY

  2. 2.HAFIZUL RAHMAN ALLIAS HAFIJOR RAHMAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJNEESH VARDHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the anticipatory bail application filed by Jannat Ansari and Hafizul Rahman as withdrawn, with permission to file a regular bail application before the trial court. The court permitted withdrawal after the petitioners' counsel sought to pursue bail through the regular procedure instead, with the State offering no objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2032/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the anticipatory bail application filed by Jannat Ansari and Hafizul Rahman as withdrawn, with permission to file a regular bail application before the trial court. The court permitted withdrawal after the petitioners' counsel sought to pursue bail through the regular procedure instead, with the State offering no objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case