PRABHU RAJWAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHWETA SINGH — Cr.A(DB)/519/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 376(I),506,IPC,4,POCSO,ACT. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010106102026
Filing Number
Cr.A(DB)/6884/2026
Filing Date
30-Mar-2026
Registration No
Cr.A(DB)/519/2026
Registration Date
24-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )
Sub-Category
Protection of children from sexual offences Act ( 14 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRABHU RAJWAR
Adv. SHEO KUMAR SINGH,RAJ NANDAN CHATTERJEE,RAJ NANDAN CHATTERJEE, ,JUHI KUMARI,VISHWAJEET KUMAR TIWARI,RAJ NANDAN CHATTERJEE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHWETA SINGH
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay,hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar SrivastavaView PDF
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay,hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar SrivastavaView PDF
Case Summary: Cr.A(DB) /519/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand admitted appellant Prabhu Rajwar's criminal appeal after allowing his interlocutory application to condone a 738-day delay in filing. The court, satisfied with the reasons provided, permitted the delayed appeal to proceed and called for trial court records for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
-
18-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.A(DB)/519/2026
Case Summary: Cr.A(DB) /519/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand admitted appellant Prabhu Rajwar's criminal appeal after allowing his interlocutory application to condone a 738-day delay in filing. The court, satisfied with the reasons provided, permitted the delayed appeal to proceed and called for trial court records for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts