SOMAR SINGH vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA — Cr.Rev./422/2020
Disposed: Contested--Dismissed AS Infractous on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010105812020
Filing Number
Cr.Rev./8072/2020
Filing Date
29-May-2020
Registration No
Cr.Rev./422/2020
Registration Date
05-Jun-2020
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )
Sub-Category
Children Sexual Protection Act ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed AS Infractous
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SOMAR SINGH
Adv. MAHESH TEWARI,ABHISHEK KUMAR DUBEY,ABHISHEK KUMAR DUBEY, ,ABHISHEK KUMAR DUBEY
-
2.TEK LAL MAHTO
-
3.DEGNARAYAN MAHTO
-
4.MD YUSUF ALAM
-
5.MANOJ KUMAR MAHTO
-
6.RAJENDRA KUMAR MAHTO ALIAS RAJ KUMAR
-
7.BHOLA SINGH
-
8.LALITA DEVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
-
2.GIRDHARI MAHTO
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar SrivastavaView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by eight petitioners as infructuous. The petitioners had challenged the trial proceedings in S.T. No. 94 of 2017, but since the trial had already concluded with their conviction by the time of the revision hearing, the court found the petition to have no purpose and dismissed it accordingly on May 8, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
-
28-Feb-2022
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
-
07-Sep-2021
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
-
02-Sep-2021
Orders(with defect)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
-
18-Dec-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-May-2020
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.Rev./422/2020
The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by eight petitioners as infructuous. The petitioners had challenged the trial proceedings in S.T. No. 94 of 2017, but since the trial had already concluded with their conviction by the time of the revision hearing, the court found the petition to have no purpose and dismissed it accordingly on May 8, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts