LALAN KUMAR DAS vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILENDRA KUMAR TIWARI Spl.P.P. — B.A./3064/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 319(2),318(4),336(3),338,340(2),61(2),BNS,66(B),66(C),66(D),84(C),IT,ACT. Disposed: --Bail on 30th April 2026.
CNR: JHHC010105572026
Filing Number
B.A./6843/2026
Filing Date
30-Mar-2026
Registration No
B.A./3064/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Information Technology Act, 2000 ( 208 )
Sub-Category
Cyber Crime ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
30-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Bail
Last updated 22-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LALAN KUMAR DAS
Adv. ANKIT KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILENDRA KUMAR TIWARI Spl.P.P.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Lalan Kumar Das, accused of cyber crimes under BNS and IT Act sections, on a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. The court's decision was based on the fact that the charge-sheet had already been filed, the petitioner had no criminal antecedents, and only one victim was identified despite multiple complaints in the portal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3064/2026
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Lalan Kumar Das, accused of cyber crimes under BNS and IT Act sections, on a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. The court's decision was based on the fact that the charge-sheet had already been filed, the petitioner had no criminal antecedents, and only one victim was identified despite multiple complaints in the portal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts