SURAJ KR DAS ALIAS SURAJ KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILENDRA KUMAR TIWARI Spl.P.P. — B.A./2948/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 319(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2),61(2),BNS,66B,66C,66D,84(C),IT,ACT. Disposed: --Bail on 30th April 2026.
CNR: JHHC010105442026
Filing Number
B.A./6830/2026
Filing Date
30-Mar-2026
Registration No
B.A./2948/2026
Registration Date
08-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Information Technology Act, 2000 ( 208 )
Sub-Category
Cyber Crime ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
30-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Bail
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURAJ KR DAS ALIAS SURAJ KUMAR
Adv. RAHUL RANJAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILENDRA KUMAR TIWARI Spl.P.P.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Suraj Kumar Das in a cybercrime case, directing him to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. The court considered that the charge-sheet had already been filed, the petitioner had no criminal antecedents, and only one victim was identified, warranting his release subject to conditions including regular court attendance and cooperation with proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
13-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
-
13-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./2948/2026
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Suraj Kumar Das in a cybercrime case, directing him to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. The court considered that the charge-sheet had already been filed, the petitioner had no criminal antecedents, and only one victim was identified, warranting his release subject to conditions including regular court attendance and cooperation with proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts