RITESH KUMAR TEBRIWAL ALIAS RITESH TEBRIWAL vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABHU DAYAL AGRAWAL, ,PRABHU DAYAL AGRAWAL — Cr.M.P./1001/2024
Case under An Application U/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 3(1),(ZZ),(Viii),FS,S,ACT,3(1),(ZX),FOOD,SAFETY,STANDARD,ACT,59. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010104562024
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./7664/2024
Filing Date
21-Mar-2024
Registration No
Cr.M.P./1001/2024
Registration Date
03-Apr-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Quashing Matter ( 206 )
Sub-Category
Quashing of Entire Criminal Proceedings ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 22-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RITESH KUMAR TEBRIWAL ALIAS RITESH TEBRIWAL
Adv. MANOJ KR. NO.3,AMRITANSHU SINGH,AMRITANSHU SINGH, ,ASHOK KUMAR,PRATYUSH,AMRITANSHU SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABHU DAYAL AGRAWAL, ,PRABHU DAYAL AGRAWAL
-
2.AMIT KUMAR RAM
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand granted the petitioner's prayer for time as a final opportunity and adjourned the criminal miscellaneous petition for six weeks. The interim relief previously granted on 27.03.2025 was vacated due to the petitioner's unpreparedness for hearing, and the Registry was directed to inform the concerned court accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
27-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ambuj NathView PDF
-
06-May-2024
Lawazima
Registrar (Judicial)
-
21-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.M.P./1001/2024
The High Court of Jharkhand granted the petitioner's prayer for time as a final opportunity and adjourned the criminal miscellaneous petition for six weeks. The interim relief previously granted on 27.03.2025 was vacated due to the petitioner's unpreparedness for hearing, and the Registry was directed to inform the concerned court accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts