MINA DEVI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHASHI KUMAR VERMA — B.A./3160/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 137(2),142,127,87,BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010103882026
Filing Number
B.A./6770/2026
Filing Date
26-Mar-2026
Registration No
B.A./3160/2026
Registration Date
13-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MINA DEVI
Adv. NIVEDITA KUNDU,ANSHUL TUBEEN KUMAR,ANSHUL TUBEEN KUMAR, ,ANSHUL TUBEEN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHASHI KUMAR VERMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Mina Devi, who was arrested in a POCSO case (Khunti P.S. Case No. 230/2025) under BNS Sections 137(2), 142, 127, and 87. The court found that while the victim voluntarily left home with a co-accused and stayed one night at Mina's house using her phone, Mina was not named in the FIR and the primary allegations were against the co-accused. Given the charge-sheet's submission and Mina's clean criminal record, the court enlarged her on bail of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions including mandatory court attendance, deposit of Aadhar Card and mobile number, and full cooperation with proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3160/2026
CASE SUMMARY: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Mina Devi, who was arrested in a POCSO case (Khunti P.S. Case No. 230/2025) under BNS Sections 137(2), 142, 127, and 87. The court found that while the victim voluntarily left home with a co-accused and stayed one night at Mina's house using her phone, Mina was not named in the FIR and the primary allegations were against the co-accused. Given the charge-sheet's submission and Mina's clean criminal record, the court enlarged her on bail of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions including mandatory court attendance, deposit of Aadhar Card and mobile number, and full cooperation with proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts