UDAY NARAYAN SINGH vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR — WPC/3183/2026
Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn on 04th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010103802026
Filing Number
WPC/3615/2026
Filing Date
26-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPC/3183/2026
Registration Date
29-Apr-2026
Judge
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Coram
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND REVENUE , TENANCY & NAZUL ( 146 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UDAY NARAYAN SINGH
Adv. BINOD KUMAR,NANDA KUMARI,NANDA KUMARI, ,NANDA KUMARI
-
2.VIJAY KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR
-
2.THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, REGISTRATION AND LAND REFORMS
-
3.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, LATEHAR
-
4.THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, LATEHAR
-
5.THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER, LATEHAR
-
6.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, PALAMAU TIGER RESERVE, DALTONGANJ
-
7.THE CIRCLE OFFICER, MAHUADANR
-
8.JAGESHWAR MAHTO
-
9.KAMESHWAR YADAV
-
10.BINOD YADAV
-
11.LOCHAN YADAV
-
12.SHRI ABHISHEK RUNGTA, DIRECTOR, M/S RUNGTA METALS PRIVATE LIMITED
-
13.SHRI ALOK RUNGTA, DIRECTOR, M/S RUNGTA METALS PRIVATE LIMITED
-
14.SHRI ANIL KUMAR PATHAK, DIRECTOR, M/S RUNGTA METALS PRIVATE LIMITED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
The writ petition filed by Uday Narayan Singh and Vijay Kumar Singh was dismissed as withdrawn on 4th May 2026, with the petitioners granted liberty to file a fresh writ petition on a new cause of action if permissible by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
27-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/3183/2026
The writ petition filed by Uday Narayan Singh and Vijay Kumar Singh was dismissed as withdrawn on 4th May 2026, with the petitioners granted liberty to file a fresh writ petition on a new cause of action if permissible by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts