KADKU @ ALOK RAWANI vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KR MISHRA — B.A./2998/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 304(2),317(2),317(4),3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 15th April 2026.
CNR: JHHC010103442026
Filing Number
B.A./6731/2026
Filing Date
26-Mar-2026
Registration No
B.A./2998/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 22-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KADKU @ ALOK RAWANI
Adv. SUSHANT KUMAR SINHA,KUMAR UDAYAN,KUMAR UDAYAN, ,ROSHAN KUMAR SAW,KUMAR UDAYAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KR MISHRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Kadku @ Alok Rawani, accused of snatching a mobile phone and purse under BNS sections 304(2)/317(2)/317(4)/3(5), noting his prolonged custody since August 2025 and that a co-accused with similar charges was already granted bail. The court released him on Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, conditioned on cooperation with trial, non-interference with witnesses, and furnishing contact details and Aadhar Card to the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
26-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./2998/2026
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Kadku @ Alok Rawani, accused of snatching a mobile phone and purse under BNS sections 304(2)/317(2)/317(4)/3(5), noting his prolonged custody since August 2025 and that a co-accused with similar charges was already granted bail. The court released him on Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, conditioned on cooperation with trial, non-interference with witnesses, and furnishing contact details and Aadhar Card to the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts