RAM LAL MAHTO vs UNION OF INDIA And ORS Advocate - MD.MOKHTAR KHAN, ,BAKSHI VIBHA — WPC/881/2009

Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 30-Jun-2017

CNR: JHHC010103362009

Filing Number

WPC/3632/2009

Filing Date

24-Feb-2009

Registration No

WPC/881/2009

Registration Date

24-Feb-2009

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad

Category

SERVICE RELATING TO CENTRAL GOVT. ( 170 )

Sub-Category

Appointment ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM LAL MAHTO

    Adv. RITU KUMAR,NIKI SINHA,NIKI SINHA, ,RATNA PRABHA,NIKI SINHA,NIKI SINHA,RAVI KUMAR SINGH,NIKI SINHA,RATNA PRABHA,RATNA PRABHA,RAVI KUMAR SINGH,RATNA PRABHA,RAVI KUMAR SINGH,RAVI KUMAR SINGH,NIKI SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA And ORS Advocate - MD.MOKHTAR KHAN, ,BAKSHI VIBHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: Ram Lal Mahto v. Union of India (WPC/881/2009) The Jharkhand High Court dismissed Ram Lal Mahto's petition challenging the Army's 2002 rejection of his compassionate appointment claim. The court held that after 30 years since his father's death in 1996, the purpose of compassionate employment—providing immediate financial relief to bereaved families—had been frustrated, making the appointment unjustifiable despite the petitioner's timely initial application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan

  5. 30-Jun-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Feb-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/881/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Ram Lal Mahto v. Union of India (WPC/881/2009) The Jharkhand High Court dismissed Ram Lal Mahto's petition challenging the Army's 2002 rejection of his compassionate appointment claim. The court held that after 30 years since his father's death in 1996, the purpose of compassionate employment—providing immediate financial relief to bereaved families—had been frustrated, making the appointment unjustifiable despite the petitioner's timely initial application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case