UPENDRA HAJAM ALIAS UPENDRA PRAMANIK vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KR MISHRA — A.B.A./2011/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 85,108,80,BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010103032026

Filing Number

A.B.A./6690/2026

Filing Date

26-Mar-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2011/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 482 ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 85,108,80,BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UPENDRA HAJAM ALIAS UPENDRA PRAMANIK

    Adv. SANJANA KUMARI,RAJENDRA PRASAD GUPTA,RAJENDRA PRASAD GUPTA, ,AVISHEK PRASAD,RAJENDRA PRASAD GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KR MISHRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Upendra Hajam (age 19) in connection with Tamar P.S. Case No. 97 of 2025, where he faced allegations under Sections 85, 108, and 80 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for torture and dowry demand. The court found the FIR contained only general and omnibus allegations, and since his in-laws had been granted anticipatory bail in an identical situation, granted him bail on a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, directing his surrender within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2011/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Upendra Hajam (age 19) in connection with Tamar P.S. Case No. 97 of 2025, where he faced allegations under Sections 85, 108, and 80 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for torture and dowry demand. The court found the FIR contained only general and omnibus allegations, and since his in-laws had been granted anticipatory bail in an identical situation, granted him bail on a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, directing his surrender within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case