PREM SHARMA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY Advocate - MANISH KUMAR, ,BHARAT KUMAR — WPC/3209/2026
Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010102202026
Filing Number
WPC/3588/2026
Filing Date
25-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPC/3209/2026
Registration Date
29-Apr-2026
Judge
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Coram
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
RESIDUARY MATTERS ( 198 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PREM SHARMA
Adv. ASHIM KR SAHANI,AJIT KUMAR,AJIT KUMAR, ,AJIT KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY Advocate - MANISH KUMAR, ,BHARAT KUMAR
-
2.EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE - CUM - DISTRICT CERTIFICATE OFFICER, KODERMA
-
3.EXECUTIVE OFFICER, JHUMRITELAIYA, NAGAR PARISHAD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
Case Summary: WPC/3209/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand quashed coercive action (arrest warrant orders from March 2022 and January 2025) taken against Prem Sharma in a certificate recovery case, finding that authorities had proceeded without deciding his pending objection under the Bihar and Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act. The court directed respondent authorities to decide the objection with proper hearing to the petitioner and pass a reasoned order, keeping the coercive orders in abeyance until then. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Orders
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
04-May-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
23-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/3209/2026
Case Summary: WPC/3209/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand quashed coercive action (arrest warrant orders from March 2022 and January 2025) taken against Prem Sharma in a certificate recovery case, finding that authorities had proceeded without deciding his pending objection under the Bihar and Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act. The court directed respondent authorities to decide the objection with proper hearing to the petitioner and pass a reasoned order, keeping the coercive orders in abeyance until then. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts