AMRIT LAL GUPTA vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SURAJ DEO MUNDA — Cr.M.P./1137/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010101982026

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./6618/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

Cr.M.P./1137/2026

Registration Date

20-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

Restoration ( 18 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMRIT LAL GUPTA

    Adv. PRADYOT CHATTERJEE

  2. 2.CHHOTELAL GUPTA

  3. 3.BHARAT LAL GUPTA @ BHARAT

  4. 4.JAWAHARLAL GUPTA @ JAWAHAR LAL GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SURAJ DEO MUNDA

  2. 2.SANDEEP KUMAR AGARWAL

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No.1137/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand issued notice to the opposite party No.2 and adjourned the petition. The petitioners were directed to file requisites for service of notice on opposite party No.2 via speed post and court process within four weeks; failure to comply will result in automatic dismissal. The Rule is made returnable within six weeks, with further listing dependent on receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./1137/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No.1137/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand issued notice to the opposite party No.2 and adjourned the petition. The petitioners were directed to file requisites for service of notice on opposite party No.2 via speed post and court process within four weeks; failure to comply will result in automatic dismissal. The Rule is made returnable within six weeks, with further listing dependent on receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case