M/S RAMKRISHNA FORGINGS LTD. (PLANT- V), THRO ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, NAMELY, DINESH KUMAR PARIK, vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN — WPC/1665/2025

Disposed: --Disposed Off on 06th January 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010101072025

Filing Number

WPC/3293/2025

Filing Date

24-Mar-2025

Registration No

WPC/1665/2025

Registration Date

28-Mar-2025

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

TAXATION ( 186 )

Sub-Category

Goods And Service Tax ( 43 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

06-Jan-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S RAMKRISHNA FORGINGS LTD. (PLANT- V), THRO ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, NAMELY, DINESH KUMAR PARIK,

    Adv. SUMEET GADODIA,PRAKHAR HARIT,PRAKHAR HARIT, ,MS. SHRUTI SHEKHAR,SANYA KUMARI,CHAITANY VIJAY,NILLOHIT CHOUBEY,PRAKHAR HARIT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN

  2. 2.HIGH POWERED COMMITTEE, STATE OF JHARKHAND, THRO ITS CHAIRMAN, THE CHIEF SECRETARY,

  3. 3.THE SECRETARY, DEPT. OF INDUSTRIES, MINES AND GEOLOGY, GOVT. OF JHARKHAND,

  4. 4.THE DIRECTOR OF INDUSTRIES, DEPT. OF INDUSTRIES, MINES AND GEOLOGY, GOVT. OF JHARKHAND,

  5. 5.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DEPT. OF INDUSTRIES, MINES AND GEOLOGY, GOVT. OF JHARKHAND,

  6. 6.THE SECRETARY, DEPT. OF STATE TAXES, JHARKHAND,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand found that the High Powered Committee (HPC) breached court directions by failing to take a decision on industrial matters by the stipulated deadline (January/February 2026), instead merely redirecting claims to the Directorate of Industries without deciding itself. The court rejected the HPC's belated compliance report filed via communication rather than affidavit, and extended the deadline to 30 days with a warning that failure to comply may result in contempt proceedings against HPC members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jan-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

  4. 06-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice (Tarlok Singh Chauhan),HON'BLE Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

  5. 06-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice (Tarlok Singh Chauhan),HON'BLE Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

  6. 01-Dec-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

  7. 12-Sep-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

  8. 29-Aug-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) , Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad

  9. 01-Aug-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice (M.s. Ramachandra Rao) , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

  10. 16-Jul-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice (M.s. Ramachandra Rao) , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

  11. 10-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice (M.s. Ramachandra Rao),hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

  12. 10-Jun-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice (M.s. Ramachandra Rao) , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan

  13. 08-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice (M.s. Ramachandra Rao),hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak RoshanView PDF

  14. 08-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 24-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/1665/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand found that the High Powered Committee (HPC) breached court directions by failing to take a decision on industrial matters by the stipulated deadline (January/February 2026), instead merely redirecting claims to the Directorate of Industries without deciding itself. The court rejected the HPC's belated compliance report filed via communication rather than affidavit, and extended the deadline to 30 days with a warning that failure to comply may result in contempt proceedings against HPC members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case