MD SAFAJUL ANSARI @ MD SAFAJUL vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA — B.A./3802/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 80(2),3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 07th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010101062026
Filing Number
B.A./6556/2026
Filing Date
25-Mar-2026
Registration No
B.A./3802/2026
Registration Date
02-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD SAFAJUL ANSARI @ MD SAFAJUL
Adv. PRATHIK,ARVIND KUMAR CHOUDHARY,ARVIND KUMAR CHOUDHARY, ,ABHISHEK KUMAR MISHRA,PRATIK SINGH,RITU RAJ,SHAMBHU NATH TIWARI,ARVIND KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand rejected the bail application of Md. Safajul Ansari, who has been in custody since January 17, 2026, in connection with Jasidih P.S. Case No. 343 of 2025, registered under Sections 80(2) & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita involving allegations of dowry demand. The court found the gravity of allegations compelling—specifically that the victim wife died within one year of marriage in the matrimonial home—and declined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
16-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3802/2026
Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand rejected the bail application of Md. Safajul Ansari, who has been in custody since January 17, 2026, in connection with Jasidih P.S. Case No. 343 of 2025, registered under Sections 80(2) & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita involving allegations of dowry demand. The court found the gravity of allegations compelling—specifically that the victim wife died within one year of marriage in the matrimonial home—and declined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts