RAHUL PINGUA vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VIJOY KUMAR SINHA — B.A./5417/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(1),238,324(4),3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 18th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010100992026
Filing Number
B.A./6549/2026
Filing Date
25-Mar-2026
Registration No
B.A./5417/2026
Registration Date
12-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAHUL PINGUA
Adv. ANJANI KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VIJOY KUMAR SINHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Rahul Pingua, accused of murder and evidence tampering in connection with the death of Shriram Birua. The court found that while Pingua faced serious charges under BNS 2023, the evidence against him relied primarily on suspicion and a co-accused's confessional statement, with no independent corroborating material. Considering his clean criminal record, prolonged custody since November 2025, and that a co-accused had already been granted bail, the court enlarged Pingua on bail of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions requiring trial cooperation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
15-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./5417/2026
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Rahul Pingua, accused of murder and evidence tampering in connection with the death of Shriram Birua. The court found that while Pingua faced serious charges under BNS 2023, the evidence against him relied primarily on suspicion and a co-accused's confessional statement, with no independent corroborating material. Considering his clean criminal record, prolonged custody since November 2025, and that a co-accused had already been granted bail, the court enlarged Pingua on bail of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions requiring trial cooperation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts