MUKESH KUMAR YADAV ALLIAS MUKERA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABHU DAYAL AGRAWAL — A.B.A./2119/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 316(5),318(4),61(2),308(5),317(4),317(5),3(5),BNS,7,EC,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010100952026
Filing Number
A.B.A./6545/2026
Filing Date
25-Mar-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./2119/2026
Registration Date
17-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES ( 131 )
Sub-Category
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUKESH KUMAR YADAV ALLIAS MUKERA
Adv. RITESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABHU DAYAL AGRAWAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Mukesh Kumar Yadav in a case involving alleged illegal transportation of PDS rice grains in his pickup van. The court found that while Yadav owned the commercial vehicle, the rice was loaded by other persons, and granted bail on furnishing Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, requiring surrender within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
29-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
15-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2119/2026
The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Mukesh Kumar Yadav in a case involving alleged illegal transportation of PDS rice grains in his pickup van. The court found that while Yadav owned the commercial vehicle, the rice was loaded by other persons, and granted bail on furnishing Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, requiring surrender within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts