SONU RAM ALIAS SONU KUMAR ALIAS MATKO,,ALLIAS SONU KUMAR RAM vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ANUP PAWAN TOPNO — B.A./3025/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 80,BNS. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010100752026

Filing Number

B.A./6526/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

B.A./3025/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 22-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 80,BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SONU RAM ALIAS SONU KUMAR ALIAS MATKO,,ALLIAS SONU KUMAR RAM

    Adv. AMAN SHEKHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ANUP PAWAN TOPNO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

    Summary The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail application of Sonu Ram, accused of dowry-related offenses under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, following his wife's death within one year of marriage in the matrimonial home. The court found the direct allegation of dowry demand in the FIR lodged by the victim's father, combined with the circumstances of death, sufficient grounds to deny bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3025/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail application of Sonu Ram, accused of dowry-related offenses under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, following his wife's death within one year of marriage in the matrimonial home. The court found the direct allegation of dowry demand in the FIR lodged by the victim's father, combined with the circumstances of death, sufficient grounds to deny bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case