SATPAL SINGH SONI @ SONI ALIAS SATPAL SINGH vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - GAUTAM RAKESH — A.B.A./2095/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 120(b),302,34,IPC,37,ARMS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010099682026
Filing Number
A.B.A./6480/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./2095/2026
Registration Date
16-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )
Sub-Category
Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SATPAL SINGH SONI @ SONI ALIAS SATPAL SINGH
Adv. KASHISH TIWARY, ,AKHOURI AWINASH KUMAR,AJAY KUMAR SAH,INDRAJIT SINHA,KUMAR VIMAL,ASHWINI PRIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - GAUTAM RAKESH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court dismissed Satpal Singh Soni's anticipatory bail application (related to Govindpur P.S. Case No. 53 of 2023) as withdrawn. The petitioner sought to withdraw the application after the State informed the court that criminal process under Section 83 of the CrPC had already been issued against him. The State raised no objection, and the court permitted withdrawal with liberty to pursue alternative remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
29-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
13-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2095/2026
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court dismissed Satpal Singh Soni's anticipatory bail application (related to Govindpur P.S. Case No. 53 of 2023) as withdrawn. The petitioner sought to withdraw the application after the State informed the court that criminal process under Section 83 of the CrPC had already been issued against him. The State raised no objection, and the court permitted withdrawal with liberty to pursue alternative remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts