PRAKASH RAI vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VINEET KUMAR VASHISTHA — Cr.A(DB)/226/2022
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010099502022
Filing Number
Cr.A(DB)/6878/2022
Filing Date
11-Mar-2022
Registration No
Cr.A(DB)/226/2022
Registration Date
24-Mar-2022
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 374(2) ( 27 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRAKASH RAI
Adv. Advocate- ,SWAMI NATH PRASAD RAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VINEET KUMAR VASHISTHA
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay,hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar SrivastavaView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to appellant Prakash Rai during the pendency of his criminal appeal, allowing his release on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. The court considered that Rai had been in custody since May 17, 2016 and was nearing a decade of imprisonment, warranting bail despite an earlier rejection of his bail application in 2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Jun-2022
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ambuj NathView PDF
-
27-Jun-2022
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ambuj NathView PDF
-
27-Jun-2022
Orders
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath
-
19-Apr-2022
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay,hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
-
19-Apr-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2022
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.A(DB)/226/2022
Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to appellant Prakash Rai during the pendency of his criminal appeal, allowing his release on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. The court considered that Rai had been in custody since May 17, 2016 and was nearing a decade of imprisonment, warranting bail despite an earlier rejection of his bail application in 2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts