SUNNY SUPRABHAT vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHIV SHANKAR KUMAR — Cr.M.P./1360/2026
Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 341,323,448,452,379,504,385,420,34,IPC. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010099452026
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./6463/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
Cr.M.P./1360/2026
Registration Date
04-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Quashing Matter ( 206 )
Sub-Category
Quashing of Entire Criminal Proceedings ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUNNY SUPRABHAT
Adv. SATYANSHU SHUBHAM,LALIT YADAV,LALIT YADAV, ,LALIT YADAV
-
2.ANURAG ANAND
-
3.SHREEKANT RAUT
-
4.PANKAJ KUMAR ALIAS PANKAJ RAUT
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHIV SHANKAR KUMAR
-
2.PAPPU KUMAR YADAV
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: In Cr.M.P. No.1360/2026, the High Court of Jharkhand issued notice to opposite party no.2 and directed petitioners Sunny Suprabhat, Anurag Anand, and Shreekant Raut to file requisites for service of notice within two weeks, failing which the petition will be dismissed. The rule is made returnable within six weeks, with the case to be relisted after receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
18-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.M.P./1360/2026
Case Summary: In Cr.M.P. No.1360/2026, the High Court of Jharkhand issued notice to opposite party no.2 and directed petitioners Sunny Suprabhat, Anurag Anand, and Shreekant Raut to file requisites for service of notice within two weeks, failing which the petition will be dismissed. The rule is made returnable within six weeks, with the case to be relisted after receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts