GANPAT MAHTO ALIAS GANPAT KUMAR MAHTO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - NAVEEN KR GAUNJHU, ,SUDHANSU KUMAR DEO — B.A./2978/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 65(i),140(3),BNS,POCSO,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010099372026

Filing Number

B.A./6455/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

B.A./2978/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )

Sub-Category

Protection of children from sexual offences Act ( 14 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 65(i),140(3),BNS,POCSO,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GANPAT MAHTO ALIAS GANPAT KUMAR MAHTO

    Adv. SATYANSHU SHUBHAM,LALIT YADAV,LALIT YADAV, ,LALIT YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - NAVEEN KR GAUNJHU, ,SUDHANSU KUMAR DEO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

    Summary: The Jharkhand High Court dismissed a bail application filed by Ganpat Mahto, who was in custody for offenses under Section 65(1) of BNS and Section 4/6 of the POCSO Act. The court was not inclined to grant bail, and the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application, which was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./2978/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Jharkhand High Court dismissed a bail application filed by Ganpat Mahto, who was in custody for offenses under Section 65(1) of BNS and Section 4/6 of the POCSO Act. The court was not inclined to grant bail, and the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application, which was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case