MD. IKBAL ANSARI ALIAS IKBAL ANSARI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SAKET KUMAR — B.A./2997/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 317(5),61(2),338,336(3),340(2),318(4),3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 15th April 2026.
CNR: JHHC010098942026
Filing Number
B.A./6412/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
B.A./2997/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 22-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD. IKBAL ANSARI ALIAS IKBAL ANSARI
Adv. SUSHANT KUMAR SINHA,KUMAR UDAYAN,KUMAR UDAYAN, ,KUMAR UDAYAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SAKET KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Summary The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Md. Ikbal Ansari, accused of vehicle theft and related offenses, after he spent over four months in custody since December 2025. The court ordered his release on a Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including cooperation with trial, furnishing mobile number and Aadhar Card, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
06-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./2997/2026
Summary The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Md. Ikbal Ansari, accused of vehicle theft and related offenses, after he spent over four months in custody since December 2025. The court ordered his release on a Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including cooperation with trial, furnishing mobile number and Aadhar Card, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts