TINKU TANTI @ TINKOO TANTI vs THE CENTRAL COALFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN - CUM - MANAGING DIRECTOR Advocate - ANOOP KR MEHTA, ,KUMAR HARSH — C.M.P./485/2026
Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 19th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010098702026
Filing Number
C.M.P./3477/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
C.M.P./485/2026
Registration Date
08-May-2026
Judge
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Coram
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )
Sub-Category
RESTORATION. ( 12 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
19-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TINKU TANTI @ TINKOO TANTI
Adv. RAJ, ,SAMAVESH BHANJ DEO,RITU KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE CENTRAL COALFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN - CUM - MANAGING DIRECTOR Advocate - ANOOP KR MEHTA, ,KUMAR HARSH
-
2.THE GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRAL COALFIELDS LIMITED, ARGADA AREA
-
3.THE DIRECTOR (P/IR), CENTRAL COALFIELDS LIMITED
-
4.THE PROJECT OFFICER, CENTRAL COALFIELDS LIMITED, GIDDI WASHERY
-
5.THE STAFF OFFICER (PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATION), CENTRAL COALFIELDS LIMITED, ARGADA AREA
-
6.THE AREA FINANCE MANAGER, CENTRAL COALFIELDS LIMITED, ARGADA AREA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jun-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
The Jharkhand High Court allowed Tinku Tanti's restoration petition to reinstate WP(S) No. 2580 of 2022, which had been dismissed for non-prosecution. The court accepted the petitioner's explanation for non-appearance and the undertaking to appear for arguments, restoring the writ petition to its original file for further proceedings according to court roster. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
Admission
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
21-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. C.M.P./485/2026
The Jharkhand High Court allowed Tinku Tanti's restoration petition to reinstate WP(S) No. 2580 of 2022, which had been dismissed for non-prosecution. The court accepted the petitioner's explanation for non-appearance and the undertaking to appear for arguments, restoring the writ petition to its original file for further proceedings according to court roster. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts