ARJUN KUMAR SAW ALIAS ARJUN KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ACHINTO SEN, ,PRABHASH CH. SINHA,ABHIJEET SUMAN — B.A./2921/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),118(I),351(2),352,74,303(2),125,109,3(5)BNS. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 04th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010098532026
Filing Number
B.A./6386/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
B.A./2921/2026
Registration Date
07-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARJUN KUMAR SAW ALIAS ARJUN KUMAR
Adv. ROHIT RANJAN SINHA,VISHAL KUMAR,VISHAL KUMAR, ,SAURABH SAGAR,DIVYA,VISHAL KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ACHINTO SEN, ,PRABHASH CH. SINHA,ABHIJEET SUMAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court rejected Arjun Kumar Saw's bail application in a case involving grievous assault charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that unlike similarly situated co-accused who were granted bail, the petitioner's case was distinguishable due to specific eyewitness and victim testimony directly alleging he assaulted the victim with a brick causing grievous head injuries, warranting continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
13-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
-
13-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
10-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./2921/2026
The Jharkhand High Court rejected Arjun Kumar Saw's bail application in a case involving grievous assault charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that unlike similarly situated co-accused who were granted bail, the petitioner's case was distinguishable due to specific eyewitness and victim testimony directly alleging he assaulted the victim with a brick causing grievous head injuries, warranting continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts