UMA RANI SHAW vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUCHENDRA PRASAD — WPC/1247/2021

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010098352021

Filing Number

WPC/1794/2021

Filing Date

12-Mar-2021

Registration No

WPC/1247/2021

Registration Date

19-Mar-2021

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

RESIDUARY MATTERS ( 198 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UMA RANI SHAW

    Adv. SOUMITRA BAROI, ,SATYAJIT BAKSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUCHENDRA PRASAD

  2. 2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER EAST SINGHBHUM JAMSHEDPUR

  3. 3.THE SUBDIVISIONAL OFFICER

  4. 4.BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER DHALBHUMGARH

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Summary: WPC/1247/2021 The Jharkhand High Court allowed petitioner Uma Rani Shaw's prayer to file an interlocutory application impleading Siuli Shao as a party. Siuli Shao allegedly attempted to convert a constructed building into a P.M. Awas scheme property, collected money for this purpose, and became a beneficiary herself. The court granted time to the petitioner to file the appropriate impleadment application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Admission

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  5. 25-Jul-2022

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

  6. 25-Jul-2022

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

  7. 05-Aug-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 12-Mar-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/1247/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPC/1247/2021 The Jharkhand High Court allowed petitioner Uma Rani Shaw's prayer to file an interlocutory application impleading Siuli Shao as a party. Siuli Shao allegedly attempted to convert a constructed building into a P.M. Awas scheme property, collected money for this purpose, and became a beneficiary herself. The court granted time to the petitioner to file the appropriate impleadment application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case