MD IRSHAD vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - GAUTAM RAKESH — B.A./3837/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 25(I-B)a,26/35,ARMS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010097982026

Filing Number

B.A./6345/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

B.A./3837/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )

Sub-Category

Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 25(I-B)a,26/35,ARMS,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD IRSHAD

    Adv. ASHOK KR SINHA (

  2. 2.,SUMEET ANAND,SUMEET ANAND, ,DILIP KUMAR SRIVASTAWA,SUMEET ANAND

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - GAUTAM RAKESH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to petitioner Md. Irshad, accused of illegal possession of a country-made pistol under the Arms Act, after he had been in custody since October 2025. The court released him on a Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, imposing conditions that he cooperate with trial, maintain contact via a fixed mobile number, and refrain from intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3837/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to petitioner Md. Irshad, accused of illegal possession of a country-made pistol under the Arms Act, after he had been in custody since October 2025. The court released him on a Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, imposing conditions that he cooperate with trial, maintain contact via a fixed mobile number, and refrain from intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case