SHYAM ROUT @ SHYAM RAUT vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA — A.B.A./1870/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126(2),352,115(2),118(I),117,351(2),351(3),109,(I),303(2),324(4)3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010097452026

Filing Number

A.B.A./6310/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./1870/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 482 ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126(2),352,115(2),118(I),117,351(2),351(3),109,(I),303(2),324(4)3(5),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHYAM ROUT @ SHYAM RAUT

    Adv. RISHAV KUMAR,AJAY KUMAR SAH,AJAY KUMAR SAH, ,AJAY KUMAR SAH

  2. 2.MUKESH KUMAR RAUT @ MUKESH KUMAR ROUT

  3. 3.MANTU KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand corrected typographical errors in a prior order dated 29.04.2026, where the district was wrongly mentioned as Giridih instead of Dumka, and the court was incorrectly identified as S.D.J.M., Giridih instead of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dumka. The court modified the order to reflect the correct jurisdictional details and extended two weeks' additional time to the petitioners to surrender before the proper court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./1870/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand corrected typographical errors in a prior order dated 29.04.2026, where the district was wrongly mentioned as Giridih instead of Dumka, and the court was incorrectly identified as S.D.J.M., Giridih instead of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dumka. The court modified the order to reflect the correct jurisdictional details and extended two weeks' additional time to the petitioners to surrender before the proper court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case