MAKSUD ANSARI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - NAWIN KR SINGH — B.A./3086/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(I),3(5),BNS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010096772026
Filing Number
B.A./6258/2026
Filing Date
20-Mar-2026
Registration No
B.A./3086/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAKSUD ANSARI
Adv. ANKIT KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - NAWIN KR SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court rejected Maksud Ansari's bail application in a murder case where he is accused of killing his wife by slitting her neck. The court found the direct allegation against him sufficiently serious to warrant continued custody, despite his claim of false implication and lack of criminal history. The court directed the State to promptly produce remaining witnesses and the FSL report before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
18-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
-
18-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
16-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3086/2026
The Jharkhand High Court rejected Maksud Ansari's bail application in a murder case where he is accused of killing his wife by slitting her neck. The court found the direct allegation against him sufficiently serious to warrant continued custody, despite his claim of false implication and lack of criminal history. The court directed the State to promptly produce remaining witnesses and the FSL report before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts