SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH ALIAS SANTOSH KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY — JHHC10096282025

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010096282025

Filing Number

Cr.Rev./6502/2025

Filing Date

20-Mar-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH ALIAS SANTOSH KUMAR

    Adv. RAM NARESH SINGH,RAM PRAKASH SINGH,RAM PRAKASH SINGH, ,RAM PRAKASH SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY

  2. 2.CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT FINANCE COMPANY LTD

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    Case Summary: Santosh Kumar Singh's application (I.A. No. 9191 of 2025) for exemption from surrender under Rule 159 of the Jharkhand High Court Rules was rejected. The petitioner claimed severe jaundice and heart disease as grounds for exemption in connection with Complaint Case No. 2505 of 2018; however, medical evidence showed the jaundice had been cured and the cardiologist's report revealed no heart irregularities, rendering the grounds unsupported. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2025

    Lawazima

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 20-Mar-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Santosh Kumar Singh's application (I.A. No. 9191 of 2025) for exemption from surrender under Rule 159 of the Jharkhand High Court Rules was rejected. The petitioner claimed severe jaundice and heart disease as grounds for exemption in connection with Complaint Case No. 2505 of 2018; however, medical evidence showed the jaundice had been cured and the cardiologist's report revealed no heart irregularities, rendering the grounds unsupported. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case