JAGDISH PRASAD SWARNKAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KR MISHRA — Cr.M.P./701/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 18,19,20,22,PWDV,ACT. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: JHHC010095692025

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./6453/2025

Filing Date

19-03-2025

Registration No

Cr.M.P./701/2026

Registration Date

18-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )

Sub-Category

Women From Domestic Violence Act ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 18,19,20,22,PWDV,ACT

Petitioner(s)

JAGDISH PRASAD SWARNKAR

Adv. PRIYANKA AGRAWAL,AYUSH KUMAR VERMA,AYUSH KUMAR VERMA, ,NILESH KUMAR,SONAL SODHANI,SONAL PANDEY,AYUSH KUMAR VERMA

KAUSHALYA DEVI

SATISH KUMAR

SANGEETA DEVI

VARSHA RANI

SAUEAV SAGAR ALIAS SAURABH SAGAR

SUMAN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KR MISHRA

ARCHANA BARMAN

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

08-04-2025

LAWAZIMA

Orders

23-03-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No.701 of 2026 The High Court of Jharkhand issued notice to opposite party No.2 and directed the petitioners (Jagdish Prasad Swarnkar & Others) to file service requisites within one week via speed post and court process, failing which the petition would be dismissed. The rule is returnable within six weeks, with further listing contingent on receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No.701 of 2026 The High Court of Jharkhand issued notice to opposite party No.2 and directed the petitioners (Jagdish Prasad Swarnkar & Others) to file service requisites within one week via speed post and court process, failing which the petition would be dismissed. The rule is returnable within six weeks, with further listing contingent on receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case