PACHU GOPE And ORS. vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - APP, ,ANUP PAWAN TOPNO — Cr.A(DB)/1/2003

Next hearing: 11th August 2026.

Next hearing 11-Aug-2026

CNR: JHHC010095482003

Filing Number

Cr.A(DB)/11270/2003

Filing Date

02-Jan-2003

Registration No

Cr.A(DB)/1/2003

Registration Date

02-Jan-2003

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

Section 374(2) & 389(1) 389(2) ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PACHU GOPE And ORS.

    Adv. T.R.BAJAJ,RANDHIR SINGH,RANDHIR SINGH, ,PRABHASH CH. SINHA,RANDHIR SINGH,RANDHIR SINGH,RANDHIR SINGH,RANDHIR SINGH

  2. 2.Kedar Gope

  3. 3.Hemraj Gope

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor), ,ANUP PAWAN TOPNO

Case History

  1. 11-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Aug-2026

    Hearing (On Bail)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay,hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar SrivastavaView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the criminal appeals filed by Pachu Gope and Dular Gope against the State of Jharkhand to 11.08.2026. The court directed the appellant's counsel to file requisites and obtain a paper book, while the office was instructed to get depositions typed and served to all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Jan-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.A(DB)/1/2003

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the criminal appeals filed by Pachu Gope and Dular Gope against the State of Jharkhand to 11.08.2026. The court directed the appellant's counsel to file requisites and obtain a paper book, while the office was instructed to get depositions typed and served to all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case