UMESH MAHTO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ACB Advocate - VINEET KUMAR VASHISTHA — Cr.A(SJ)/300/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 3(2),r/w, 13(1)(c),13(1)(d),PC,ACT. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Next hearing 23-Jun-2026

CNR: JHHC010095442026

Filing Number

Cr.A(SJ)/6191/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

Cr.A(SJ)/300/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CORRUPTION ( 120 )

Sub-Category

Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 3(2),r/w, 13(1)(c),13(1)(d),PC,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UMESH MAHTO

    Adv. JAI MOHAN MISHRA,VISHAL KUMAR TRIVEDI,VISHAL KUMAR TRIVEDI, ,VISHAL KUMAR TRIVEDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ACB Advocate - VINEET KUMAR VASHISTHA

  2. 2.INDU SHEKHAR JHA

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF

    Summary of Cr.A(SJ) /300/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand consolidated 17 criminal appeals involving vigilance and corruption charges. The Court criticized the State's inability to identify specific crimes or victims under SC/ST (PoA) Act, noting persons were detained without disclosed offenses. The case was adjourned to 23.06.2026 for the State to prepare better arguments. Additionally, appellant Kumari Ratnakar was granted one-month provisional bail (Rs.10,000 bond with sureties) due to her especially-abled child's need for maternal care. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF

  6. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.A(SJ)/300/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Cr.A(SJ) /300/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand consolidated 17 criminal appeals involving vigilance and corruption charges. The Court criticized the State's inability to identify specific crimes or victims under SC/ST (PoA) Act, noting persons were detained without disclosed offenses. The case was adjourned to 23.06.2026 for the State to prepare better arguments. Additionally, appellant Kumari Ratnakar was granted one-month provisional bail (Rs.10,000 bond with sureties) due to her especially-abled child's need for maternal care. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case