RAJA RAM JAMUDA @ REJAD JAMUDA vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - JITENDRA PANDEY — B.A./3000/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 310(2),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010095352026

Filing Number

B.A./6182/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

B.A./3000/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail

Last updated 22-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 310(2),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJA RAM JAMUDA @ REJAD JAMUDA

    Adv. VIKASH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - JITENDRA PANDEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Raja Ram Jamuda, accused of dacoity under BNS Section 310(2), considering that he was implicated solely based on co-accused statements without direct evidence and no witnesses had been examined despite the charge sheet being filed. The petitioner was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with conditions to cooperate with trial, provide contact details, and not intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3000/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Raja Ram Jamuda, accused of dacoity under BNS Section 310(2), considering that he was implicated solely based on co-accused statements without direct evidence and no witnesses had been examined despite the charge sheet being filed. The petitioner was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with conditions to cooperate with trial, provide contact details, and not intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case